Man is Born Free but Everywhere He is in Chains When a man is innate, he is unloose, for he is then above all sorts of bondages, sociable political, righteous and sacred He is not then concerned to any one and no one is consanguineous to him in any way. He then enjoys infrangible immunity. But as he proceeds in his life’s journeying and advances in eld he finds himself pinioned by chains quite unidentified to him. In his immaturity, he cannot live by himself, but has to depend on his mother’s fortering fear for his story. As he grows in age he finds that he cannot do anything and everything according to his own kickshaw testament. His movements are modified and his reproof, whenever it is unwanted or inclement, is humor all day monthlong, but cannot and has to submit himself to the subject of his train. When finishes his pedagogy he marries, but finds himself writer and many in chains.
He cannot relish a aliveness of alleviate. Which his disposition eagerly hankers after, but has- to track a brio of donkey work for maintaining his parents, mate and children. As a sociable beingness, he is not allowed to propose and act as he pleases:he is to submit to sociable laws and curb his independence in yarn to and for the intoxicant of others. As a citizen, he is to obey the laws of his dos and whenever he transgresses them, he is put to belittle. In matters religious affairs he is to resilient with the group of his institution in music
We thusly see that at the example of birthing a man is quite freeborn, but this freedom begins to bust out as he advances in story. The statesman he grows in eld, the more does he gestate himself in chains. In this- way he is compelled to relinquish all his freedom to the grouping he lives in and regains it in toto only when he cuts off all connections with it and departs from it forever.